I am not writing to agree or disagree with Reporter. What I have to say, however, regards Reporter's conscious decision to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how Reporter should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, Reporter's screeds sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.

Some readers may doubt that Reporter is wild enough to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place. So let me provide some evidence. But before I do, let me just say that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? One wonders if he has the cheek to devalue me as a person. I unmistakably hope not because his arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. It's our responsibility to change the minds of those who control, manipulate, and harm other people. That's the first step in trying to name and shame his associates for their obdurate acts of mercantalism, and it's the only way to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity.

A more fundamental problem is that I have reason to believe that Reporter is about to break down traditional values. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which Reporter may exclude all people and proposals that oppose his unprincipled hastily mounted campaigns as soon as our backs are turned, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that Reporter deeply believes that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is an addlepated dunderhead deserving of death and damnation. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Reporter wants to portray biased wicked-types as finks. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.

Reporter seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, semi-intelligible criminal masterminds. It has been said that this is no laughing matter. That makes sense to me. I believe it's true. But it obviously implies that some people don't seem to mind that he likes to make all of us pay for his boondoggles. What a mad world we live in! We must stop tiptoeing and begin marching boldly and forthrightly towards our goal, which is to maintain social tranquillity.

I accept the call to get the Reporter monkey off our backs and off other people's backs as well. I mean, think about it. How many of his worshippers are content to sit around doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the world around them? I'd hazard to guess that the number is pretty high. The gloss that his supporters put on his artifices unfortunately does little to call your attention to the problem of crude hoodwinkers. The facts are, succinctly, these: First, Reporter's memoranda, which are constructions of dubious stability in their own right, are built on highly questionable foundations. Second, he has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. Reporter can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches his nostrils, he'll start talking about the joy of masochism and how his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. As you listen to Reporter's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice his hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that we are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Reporter.

Reporter makes up for his lack of wit by shouting like a Vogon. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Reporter in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that if you think about it you'll see that Reporter's termagant traducements are merely a distraction. They're just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Reporter's proxies are continuing their quiet work of advancing Reporter's real goal, which is to place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. His cop-outs are undeniably not on the up and up. To prove this, I shall take only a few cases from the mass of existing examples.

I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that Reporter's satraps have cooperated closely with the most brutish know-nothings I've ever seen on several projects. What I mean is that I should note that I've tried to explain to his malodorous vassals that he has been a bad apple for as long as I can remember. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that if Reporter is going to talk about higher standards then he needs to live by those higher standards.

Reporter's demands leave me with several unanswered questions: Why do his patsies want to ingratiate themselves with him? And how far do his lies extend? These are difficult questions to answer because we must restore the traditions that he has abandoned. Only then can a society free of his mudslinging, unimaginative canards blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that he is absolutely determined to believe that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way.

It is reasonable to infer that we must honestly take personal action and address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Reporter because they saw no other options for change. Does that sound extremist? Is it too unambitious for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way but that's life. He often argues that we can stop absolutism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for squalid renegades. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known mafia don and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that no reasonable person would deny that this is typical of the kind of noise Reporter enjoys making. For proof of this fact I must point out that Reporter plans to introduce absurd, baseless, terror-ridden lawsuits intended to destroy the lives of countless innocent people any day now. I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that Reporter's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of wisecracks. Others are in the form of contrivances. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion.

I am familiar with Reporter's goals, I understand how he operates, I have long recognized his tactics, and I know just about where Reporter now stands on the ladder to total power. I can therefore say that, certainly, he should think about how his declamations lead the most snippy sad sacks I've ever seen to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. If Reporter doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. More often than not, I am worried about a new physiognomy of servitude, a compliant citizenry relieved of its burdens by a "compassionate" Reporter. It's hard to spot the compassion when you notice that the problem of distasteful, scurrilous talebearers serves as an excuse for him to express his own hostility and frustrated need for power. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. His thralls are currently in the streets, burning, robbing, and looting. I'll go further: He is laughing up his sleeve at us. That's self-evident, and even Reporter would probably agree with me on that. Even so, I am shocked and angered by his bumptious, misinformed improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. While this letter hasn't provided anything in the way of a concrete plan of action, it may help us focus our thinking a little better when we do work out a plan. For now, we must deal stiffly with rancorous moochers who hurt people's feelings. I will definitely be happy to have your help in this endeavor.

buckwheat wrote:
I am not writing to agree or disagree with Reporter. What I have to say, however, regards Reporter's conscious decision to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how Reporter should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, Reporter's screeds sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.

Some readers may doubt that Reporter is wild enough to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place. So let me provide some evidence. But before I do, let me just say that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? One wonders if he has the cheek to devalue me as a person. I unmistakably hope not because his arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. It's our responsibility to change the minds of those who control, manipulate, and harm other people. That's the first step in trying to name and shame his associates for their obdurate acts of mercantalism, and it's the only way to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity.

A more fundamental problem is that I have reason to believe that Reporter is about to break down traditional values. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which Reporter may exclude all people and proposals that oppose his unprincipled hastily mounted campaigns as soon as our backs are turned, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that Reporter deeply believes that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is an addlepated dunderhead deserving of death and damnation. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Reporter wants to portray biased wicked-types as finks. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.

Reporter seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, semi-intelligible criminal masterminds. It has been said that this is no laughing matter. That makes sense to me. I believe it's true. But it obviously implies that some people don't seem to mind that he likes to make all of us pay for his boondoggles. What a mad world we live in! We must stop tiptoeing and begin marching boldly and forthrightly towards our goal, which is to maintain social tranquillity.

I accept the call to get the Reporter monkey off our backs and off other people's backs as well. I mean, think about it. How many of his worshippers are content to sit around doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the world around them? I'd hazard to guess that the number is pretty high. The gloss that his supporters put on his artifices unfortunately does little to call your attention to the problem of crude hoodwinkers. The facts are, succinctly, these: First, Reporter's memoranda, which are constructions of dubious stability in their own right, are built on highly questionable foundations. Second, he has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. Reporter can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches his nostrils, he'll start talking about the joy of masochism and how his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. As you listen to Reporter's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice his hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that we are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Reporter.

Reporter makes up for his lack of wit by shouting like a Vogon. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Reporter in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that if you think about it you'll see that Reporter's termagant traducements are merely a distraction. They're just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Reporter's proxies are continuing their quiet work of advancing Reporter's real goal, which is to place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. His cop-outs are undeniably not on the up and up. To prove this, I shall take only a few cases from the mass of existing examples.

I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that Reporter's satraps have cooperated closely with the most brutish know-nothings I've ever seen on several projects. What I mean is that I should note that I've tried to explain to his malodorous vassals that he has been a bad apple for as long as I can remember. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that if Reporter is going to talk about higher standards then he needs to live by those higher standards.

Reporter's demands leave me with several unanswered questions: Why do his patsies want to ingratiate themselves with him? And how far do his lies extend? These are difficult questions to answer because we must restore the traditions that he has abandoned. Only then can a society free of his mudslinging, unimaginative canards blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that he is absolutely determined to believe that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way.

It is reasonable to infer that we must honestly take personal action and address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Reporter because they saw no other options for change. Does that sound extremist? Is it too unambitious for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way but that's life. He often argues that we can stop absolutism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for squalid renegades. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known mafia don and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that no reasonable person would deny that this is typical of the kind of noise Reporter enjoys making. For proof of this fact I must point out that Reporter plans to introduce absurd, baseless, terror-ridden lawsuits intended to destroy the lives of countless innocent people any day now. I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that Reporter's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of wisecracks. Others are in the form of contrivances. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion.

I am familiar with Reporter's goals, I understand how he operates, I have long recognized his tactics, and I know just about where Reporter now stands on the ladder to total power. I can therefore say that, certainly, he should think about how his declamations lead the most snippy sad sacks I've ever seen to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. If Reporter doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. More often than not, I am worried about a new physiognomy of servitude, a compliant citizenry relieved of its burdens by a "compassionate" Reporter. It's hard to spot the compassion when you notice that the problem of distasteful, scurrilous talebearers serves as an excuse for him to express his own hostility and frustrated need for power. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. His thralls are currently in the streets, burning, robbing, and looting. I'll go further: He is laughing up his sleeve at us. That's self-evident, and even Reporter would probably agree with me on that. Even so, I am shocked and angered by his bumptious, misinformed improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. While this letter hasn't provided anything in the way of a concrete plan of action, it may help us focus our thinking a little better when we do work out a plan. For now, we must deal stiffly with rancorous moochers who hurt people's feelings. I will definitely be happy to have your help in this endeavor.

Wow.

what a novel that is to much to read for me or eny one shorten it and my be il read it sum day

Gary:
The meaning for the word Tamper: Mix in, interrupt, interfere, meddle, interpose.

As long as we are asking question, I have one for you! What do you mean when you call your show a “Radio internet Show” where does Radio come into play?



Reporter

Buckwheat:

You SAID it all, I think?
I can’t believe you wrote a book about me, I only have one thing to say!
WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!!!!

Reporter

BuckWhest stop Smoking that Shit!

hmmm,


ok Mr Reporter, then i propose this to you --

keep in mind that i have never been one to go out of my way with harsh words or pictures or vile propaganda against anyone even if i felt they deserved it -- so anything on your website regarding me shouldnt be on there -- if i had said anything about you that you felt was out of context or rude or just plain obscene then i apologize sincerely.

i want to make sure this apology is public and in writing which is why i'm posting it -- b/c if Mr Reporter is as genuine as he claims then i think he will accept this from me -- i want the slander and the evil slinging of insults to STOP -- from both ends, his, mine, the shoutbox, the show, etc.

Mr Reporter has a point, there might be innocent groups here suffering from this feud, and i think its stupid.

i want a truce to be drawn. i'm willing to commit to that. i refuse to let myself get caught up in any of the drama involving Mr Reporter or anyone else -- i want to be left out of it all.

as i've said, i think if we could reach common ground, i think the both of us could do alot of good for this area -- and that is something we should direct our passion towards.

and to Buckwheat ---


your post gives me hope that there is intelligent life out there somewhere


tho after reading that again, i have to ask, are you a lawyer?? if not, then you should consider the profession!

No, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once...

You are certainly the better person for taking the high road with this nincompoop.

High five.